Candidate for New Jersey Governor Accuses Facebook of Election Interference and Censorship – Information Today Web

Facebook’s position on limiting free speech has been a subject of debate, especially when it comes to election interference. The social media giant has faced numerous accusations of influencing U.S. elections through policy changes and censorship, often favoring certain political candidates and viewpoints.

New Jersey Republican candidate for Governor Bill Spadea said the platform has been censoring his posts, confirming an earlier report by Shore News Network that the platform is once again engaging in electing interference.

In that report, Shore News Network noted that many of its posts regarding the election news cycle have been flagged as spam, but falling short of being penalized with official policy violations such as the platform has issued in the past.

The post like many others being reported by non-left-aligned media and pundits was flagged as ‘spam’.

Yup. Facebook has blocked any post linking to our campaign site…accident? Big tech censoring the only conservative in the race? Hmmm… At least Elon Musk believes in the free exchange of ideas,” Spadea wrote on Twitter.

The timeline of Facebook’s election interference dates back to 2012 when the platform suspended a Veteran PAC for posting a meme related to the Benghazi attack, which ultimately benefited President Barack Obama. In 2016, Facebook suspended numerous pro-Trump pages and pro-Bernie Sanders groups. The platform was also accused of elevating liberal news in its Trending News section while blacklisting conservative figures like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.

In 2018, Facebook censored various pro-life candidates, including Marsha Blackburn and Matt Rosendale. The censorship efforts reached a new height in 2020, with Facebook targeting Donald Trump’s campaign ads and anti-Biden content. The platform also suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story, influenced by FBI warnings about potential “Russian propaganda.”

Meta’s censorship continued into 2022, focusing on Republican candidates such as Senate candidate Eric Greiten and gubernatorial candidates Kari Lake and Kay Ivey. By 2024, Meta platforms had censored presidential candidates RFK Jr., Larry Elder, and Jill Stein.

Donald Trump faced significant censorship in 2020, with his posts being limited and his account ultimately suspended after January 6, 2021. The platform also censored posts from Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren. During the 2020 election, Facebook halted political advertising a week before the election, which critics argue disproportionately affected conservative candidates.

Despite Mark Zuckerberg’s public statements supporting free speech, Facebook’s actions often contradicted these assertions. In his 2019 Georgetown speech, Zuckerberg emphasized “giving everyone a voice,” but subsequent actions saw increased censorship aligned with recommendations from leftist groups. COO Sheryl Sandberg praised and implemented these recommendations, highlighting a significant shift from Zuckerberg’s professed ideals.

To address these issues, it is recommended that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) direct relevant committees to investigate Facebook’s election interference. State legislatures, attorneys general, and secretaries of state should enforce laws to prevent Big Tech from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Additionally, Facebook should establish a bipartisan commission to address election interference and censorship concerns.

In rare instances, Facebook has admitted to mistakes. During a Joe Rogan podcast, Zuckerberg acknowledged suppressing the New York Post Hunter Biden story under FBI pressure. Facebook also admitted to blocking links to damaging Democratic Party emails following WikiLeaks’ accusations of censorship.

Facebook’s involvement in U.S. elections reveals a complex interplay between free speech and censorship. The platform’s actions have often favored certain political outcomes, raising questions about its role in democratic processes and the need for greater accountability and transparency.

Facebook has denied allegations of restricting speech by non-left-wing aligned sources.

  • Candidate for New Jersey Governor Accuses Facebook of Election Interference and Censorship

    Facebook’s position on limiting free speech has been a subject of debate, especially when it comes to election interference. The social media giant has faced numerous accusations of influencing U.S. elections through policy changes and censorship, often favoring certain political candidates and viewpoints.

    New Jersey Republican candidate for Governor Bill Spadea said the platform has been censoring his posts, confirming an earlier report by Shore News Network that the platform is once again engaging in electing interference.

    In that report, Shore News Network noted that many of its posts regarding the election news cycle have been flagged as spam, but falling short of being penalized with official policy violations such as the platform has issued in the past.

    The post like many others being reported by non-left-aligned media and pundits was flagged as ‘spam’.

    Yup. Facebook has blocked any post linking to our campaign site…accident? Big tech censoring the only conservative in the race? Hmmm… At least Elon Musk believes in the free exchange of ideas,” Spadea wrote on Twitter.

    The timeline of Facebook’s election interference dates back to 2012 when the platform suspended a Veteran PAC for posting a meme related to the Benghazi attack, which ultimately benefited President Barack Obama. In 2016, Facebook suspended numerous pro-Trump pages and pro-Bernie Sanders groups. The platform was also accused of elevating liberal news in its Trending News section while blacklisting conservative figures like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.

    In 2018, Facebook censored various pro-life candidates, including Marsha Blackburn and Matt Rosendale. The censorship efforts reached a new height in 2020, with Facebook targeting Donald Trump’s campaign ads and anti-Biden content. The platform also suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story, influenced by FBI warnings about potential “Russian propaganda.”

    Meta’s censorship continued into 2022, focusing on Republican candidates such as Senate candidate Eric Greiten and gubernatorial candidates Kari Lake and Kay Ivey. By 2024, Meta platforms had censored presidential candidates RFK Jr., Larry Elder, and Jill Stein.

    Donald Trump faced significant censorship in 2020, with his posts being limited and his account ultimately suspended after January 6, 2021. The platform also censored posts from Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren. During the 2020 election, Facebook halted political advertising a week before the election, which critics argue disproportionately affected conservative candidates.

    Despite Mark Zuckerberg’s public statements supporting free speech, Facebook’s actions often contradicted these assertions. In his 2019 Georgetown speech, Zuckerberg emphasized “giving everyone a voice,” but subsequent actions saw increased censorship aligned with recommendations from leftist groups. COO Sheryl Sandberg praised and implemented these recommendations, highlighting a significant shift from Zuckerberg’s professed ideals.

    To address these issues, it is recommended that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) direct relevant committees to investigate Facebook’s election interference. State legislatures, attorneys general, and secretaries of state should enforce laws to prevent Big Tech from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Additionally, Facebook should establish a bipartisan commission to address election interference and censorship concerns.

    In rare instances, Facebook has admitted to mistakes. During a Joe Rogan podcast, Zuckerberg acknowledged suppressing the New York Post Hunter Biden story under FBI pressure. Facebook also admitted to blocking links to damaging Democratic Party emails following WikiLeaks’ accusations of censorship.

    Facebook’s involvement in U.S. elections reveals a complex interplay between free speech and censorship. The platform’s actions have often favored certain political outcomes, raising questions about its role in democratic processes and the need for greater accountability and transparency.

    Facebook has denied allegations of restricting speech by non-left-wing aligned sources.

  • Ohio Police Chief Fired For Being High on Weed, Falsifying Time Sheets

    New Miami, OH – The Village Council of New Miami, a small town of 2,200 people near Cincinnati, has unanimously voted to terminate Police Chief Harold Webb following allegations of a marijuana smell in his office and falsified time sheets.

    Mayor Jewel Hensley detailed the allegations in a letter, stating that Webb only reported for duty twice during a two-week period starting June 2. Despite this, Webb’s timecard claimed he worked 48 hours. Verification with Butler County Dispatch revealed that Webb only checked in for duty on June 2.

    On June 20, Hensley, along with councilmen Ken Flick and Matt Stephens, confronted Webb with the discrepancies. Webb claimed he worked the hours but hid his patrol car in the garage from the mayor as a statement, anticipating the confrontation. Webb was unable to produce his daily log and suggested reviewing video footage for evidence.

    Hensley questioned whether the job was overwhelming for Webb, who also worked full-time with the U.S. Postal Service and had family commitments. Webb insisted he could handle his duties. However, later that day, Webb contacted Hensley to retrieve the time logs from his office, further complicating the situation.

    The council’s decision marks the end of Webb’s tenure as police chief amid these troubling allegations.

  • Trump Challenges Biden to Million Dollar Golf Match, No Holds Barred Debate

    Former President Donald Trump recently challenged President Joe Biden to another presidential debate and a $1 million charity golf match during a campaign rally at Trump National Doral Golf Club in Miami, Florida. Trump proposed a “no holds barred” debate with no moderators and offered to donate $1 million to a charity of Biden’s choice if Biden accepted the golf challenge, boasting that the event would be “bigger than the Ryder Cup or even the Masters”​

    “I’m officially challenging Joe to an 18-hole golf match,” Trump said. “It will be among the most watched sporting events in history. Maybe even bigger than the Ryder Cup or the Masters. I will even give Joe Biden 10 strokes, that means 20 strokes for those who don’t play golf. If he wins, I’ll give the charity of his choice, $1 million.’

    “I bet you he won’t take the offer,” Trump added. “Because he’s all talk.”

    The recent presidential debate took an unexpected turn as former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden engaged in a heated exchange about their golfing abilities. The debate, held on June 27, saw the two candidates veering off into a playful yet competitive discussion about their golf handicaps.

    The topic arose when Trump boasted about his golf skills, claiming he was a better golfer than Biden. Biden responded by challenging Trump to a head-to-head match, insisting that he could outperform the former president on the golf course. This exchange quickly became a highlight of the debate, drawing reactions from both the audience and viewers at home.

    Trump, known for his love of golf, suggested that a charity golf match between the two would attract massive attention, even stating that it would be “bigger than the Ryder Cup or even the Masters.” He proposed a $1 million donation to a charity of Biden’s choice if Biden accepted the challenge. Trump also offered Biden a 20-stroke advantage to level the playing field, adding a layer of competitiveness to the proposed match​.

    The debate moment went viral, with many commentators and viewers discussing the unusual focus on golf during a presidential debate. Despite the light-hearted nature of the exchange, it underscored the personal rivalry between the two candidates as they head towards the 2024 election.

Source link

Candidate for New Jersey Governor Accuses Facebook of Election Interference and Censorship #Candidate #Jersey #Governor #Accuses #Facebook #Election #Interference #Censorship

Source link Google News

Source Link: https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2024/07/10/candidate-for-new-jersey-governor-accuses-facebook-of-election-interference-and-censorship/

Candidate for New Jersey Governor Accuses Facebook of Election Interference and Censorship – Information Today Web

#WP1 – BLOGGER – WP1, accuses, Candidate, censorship, election, Facebook, Governor, Information, interference, Jersey, Today, Web

https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2024/07/10/candidate-for-new-jersey-governor-accuses-facebook-of-election-interference-and-censorship/?feed_id=9191&_unique_id=668e98a2a8a5f

Author: BLOGGER